PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNA vs. MMMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNA vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2030 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNA) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNA achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than MMMA's 3.03% return.


MUNA

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMMA

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.50%
YTD
3.03%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNA vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MUNA and MMMA is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNA vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2030 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNA) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MUNA vs. MMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUNAMMMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

1.79

-0.16

Drawdowns

MUNA vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNA drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, smaller than the maximum MMMA drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNA and MMMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNAMMMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-2.79%

+1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.27%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.60%

+0.32%

Volatility

MUNA vs. MMMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNAMMMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73%

4.15%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

4.15%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.73%

4.15%

-2.42%

MUNA vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MMMA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUNA vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison

MUNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than MMMA's 1.96% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MUNA and MMMA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MUNA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUNA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MMMA.

MMMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.66% for MUNA.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUNA and 0.35% for MMMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNA and MMMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer