MULT vs. PSQO
MULT (Franklin Multisector Income ETF) and PSQO (Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MULT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for PSQO.
Performance
MULT vs. PSQO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULT achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than PSQO's 1.68% return.
MULT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSQO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULT vs. PSQO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF | 0.95% | 2.14% |
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 1.68% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULT and PSQO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULT vs. PSQO — Risk / Return Rank
MULT
PSQO
MULT vs. PSQO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MULT | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 3.14 | -1.74 |
Drawdowns
MULT vs. PSQO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULT drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, which is greater than PSQO's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULT and PSQO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULT | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -0.76% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.12% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -0.11% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility
MULT vs. PSQO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULT | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94% | 1.55% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 2.00% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 2.00% | +0.94% |
MULT vs. PSQO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MULT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PSQO's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
MULT vs. PSQO - Dividend Comparison
MULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than PSQO's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF | 3.40% | 1.56% | 0.00% |
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 4.13% | 4.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULT and PSQO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MULT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MULT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for PSQO.
PSQO has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 3.40% for MULT.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Palmer Square. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MULT and 0.52% for PSQO.
Find the right allocation for MULT and PSQO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer