MULL vs. TSYY
MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MULL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MULL returned 6074.28% vs -12.29% for TSYY. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MULL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSYY.
Performance
MULL vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 936.86% return, which is significantly higher than TSYY's -16.60% return.
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -37.48% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -15.96% | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULL and TSYY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULL vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
MULL
TSYY
MULL vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MULL | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +47.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 0.96 | +0.93 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 116.34 | -0.45 | +116.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 390.40 | -0.85 | +391.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MULL | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71 | -0.39 | +47.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.45 | -0.59 | +8.04 |
Drawdowns
MULL vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULL | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -41.52% | -30.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.09% | -27.31% | -25.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -36.69% | +36.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -25.88% | +5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.79% | 14.49% | +1.30% |
Volatility
MULL vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a higher volatility of 55.41% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 4.86%. This indicates that MULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULL | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.41% | 4.86% | +50.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.59% | 19.69% | +85.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.38% | 31.77% | +100.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 37.52% | +98.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 37.52% | +98.70% |
MULL vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MULL vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than TSYY's 282.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULL and TSYY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to TSYY (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MULL dropped -72.29% vs TSYY's -41.52%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
MULL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSYY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MULL and 0.99% for TSYY.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MULL and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer