MULL vs. LITX
MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MULL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
MULL vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MULL
- 1D
- 9.74%
- 1M
- -10.77%
- 6M
- 426.13%
- YTD
- 619.42%
- 1Y
- 3,188.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 11.65%
- 1M
- -27.14%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 304.01% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 218.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULL and LITX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULL vs. LITX — Risk / Return Rank
MULL
LITX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MULL vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MULL | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 60.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 188.54 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MULL vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -62.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULL | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -62.15% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.88% | -49.49% | +9.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.89% | -21.19% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.12% | — | — |
Volatility
MULL vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULL | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 65.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 124.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 152.42% | 193.64% | -41.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.79% | 193.64% | -48.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.79% | 193.64% | -48.85% |
MULL vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
MULL vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while LITX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.05% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULL and LITX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LITX is cheaper at 1.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LITX is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for LITX.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MULL and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for MULL and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer