MULL vs. DLLL
MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. MULL is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. Over the past year, MULL returned 6074.28% vs 850.63% for DLLL. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
MULL vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 936.86% return, which is significantly higher than DLLL's 757.76% return.
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- -6.45%
- 1M
- 245.92%
- YTD
- 757.76%
- 6M
- 648.38%
- 1Y
- 850.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 442.06% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 757.76% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULL and DLLL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.44 |
The correlation between MULL and DLLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MULL vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MULL
DLLL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MULL
DLLL
Basic Materials
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Communication Services
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Defensive
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Energy
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Financial Services
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Healthcare
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Industrials
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Real Estate
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Utilities
MULL
-
DLLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULL vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
MULL
DLLL
MULL vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MULL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +40.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 1.60 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 116.34 | 15.02 | +101.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 390.40 | 31.34 | +359.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MULL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71 | 6.65 | +40.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.45 | 3.16 | +4.30 |
Drawdowns
MULL vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than DLLL's maximum drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -68.58% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.09% | -57.19% | +4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.86% | +18.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -25.91% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.79% | 27.36% | -11.57% |
Volatility
MULL vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) is 55.41%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 69.39%. This indicates that MULL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.41% | 69.39% | -13.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.59% | 102.08% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.38% | 129.28% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 130.55% | +5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 130.55% | +5.67% |
MULL vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MULL and DLLL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
MULL vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULL and DLLL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to MULL (55.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MULL dropped -72.29% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 850.63% for DLLL. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, MULL has been the lower-risk option at 55.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 850.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MULL and DLLL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 6.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MULL and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer