PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUJ vs. FHUGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUJ vs. FHUGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A (FHUGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUJ achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly higher than FHUGX's 1.49% return.


MUJ

1D
0.90%
1M
2.01%
YTD
6.39%
6M
4.93%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
2.61%

FHUGX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.72%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUJ vs. FHUGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
6.39%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-2.02%
FHUGX
Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A
1.49%4.91%1.33%6.52%-11.00%2.16%4.28%8.06%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MUJ and FHUGX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018

0.40

The correlation between MUJ and FHUGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUJ vs. FHUGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FHUGX
FHUGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FHUGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHUGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHUGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FHUGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHUGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUJ vs. FHUGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A (FHUGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUJFHUGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.64

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.17

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

7.11

+1.82

MUJ vs. FHUGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FHUGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUJ and FHUGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUJ vs. FHUGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUJ drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, which is greater than FHUGX's maximum drawdown of -16.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUJ and FHUGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUJFHUGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-16.44%

-25.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-3.19%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.17%

-6.14%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.71%

-16.44%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-0.72%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-3.94%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

0.97%

+1.36%

Volatility

MUJ vs. FHUGX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A (FHUGX) at 0.77%. This indicates that MUJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHUGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUJFHUGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

0.77%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

2.14%

+4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.93%

2.71%

+6.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

4.13%

+6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

4.48%

+6.71%

MUJ vs. FHUGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUJ has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FHUGX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUJ vs. FHUGX - Dividend Comparison

MUJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than FHUGX's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHUGX
Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class A
2.76%3.58%2.63%2.29%1.79%2.37%2.67%2.82%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.26%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUJ and FHUGX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to FHUGX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUJ dropped -41.72% vs FHUGX's -16.44%.

FHUGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUJ and FHUGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer