PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUJ vs. AFB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUJ vs. AFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUJ achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than AFB's 6.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MUJ has outperformed AFB with an annualized return of 2.47%, while AFB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.


MUJ

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.10%
YTD
4.64%
6M
4.23%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
2.47%

AFB

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.72%
YTD
6.20%
6M
5.81%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
-1.26%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUJ vs. AFB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
4.64%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
6.20%4.41%4.10%7.41%-25.93%7.25%7.80%20.13%-5.43%6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MUJ and AFB is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2002

0.39

The correlation between MUJ and AFB shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUJ vs. AFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AFB
AFB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUJ vs. AFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUJAFBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.64

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

9.98

-2.07

MUJ vs. AFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the AFB Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUJ and AFB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUJAFBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.01

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

-0.12

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.14

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.33

+0.03

Drawdowns

MUJ vs. AFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUJ drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, smaller than the maximum AFB drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUJ and AFB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUJAFBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-50.98%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-5.96%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.17%

-16.32%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.71%

-35.17%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

-35.17%

+2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-9.57%

+6.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-8.98%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.58%

+0.74%

Volatility

MUJ vs. AFB - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) at 2.64%. This indicates that MUJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUJAFBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.64%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

5.73%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

7.88%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.35%

10.94%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.20%

11.24%

-0.04%

MUJ vs. AFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUJ has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than AFB's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUJ vs. AFB - Dividend Comparison

MUJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, more than AFB's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
5.02%4.72%3.83%3.62%5.26%4.32%4.18%3.93%4.53%4.71%5.34%5.80%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.32%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUJ and AFB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to AFB (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUJ dropped -41.72% vs AFB's -50.98%.

MUJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUJ and AFB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer