PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUIGX vs. FNSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUIGX vs. FNSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUIGX achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than FNSTX's 10.08% return.


MUIGX

1D
0.15%
1M
6.08%
YTD
11.48%
6M
11.29%
1Y
28.42%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
16.67%

FNSTX

1D
1.93%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.33%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUIGX vs. FNSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MUIGX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund
11.48%17.35%22.33%24.28%-21.86%30.48%19.17%13.47%
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
10.08%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MUIGX and FNSTX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2019

0.70

The correlation between MUIGX and FNSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUIGX vs. FNSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUIGX
MUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUIGX vs. FNSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUIGXFNSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.25

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.74

11.01

+3.73

MUIGX vs. FNSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the FNSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUIGX and FNSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUIGXFNSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.77

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.71

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.62

-0.17

Drawdowns

MUIGX vs. FNSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUIGX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, which is greater than FNSTX's maximum drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUIGX and FNSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUIGXFNSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.10%

-35.82%

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-8.43%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-13.63%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.33%

-21.97%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.84%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-5.17%

-11.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.49%

-0.50%

Volatility

MUIGX vs. FNSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) is 3.16%, while Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that MUIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUIGXFNSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

5.45%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

12.63%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

15.51%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

15.15%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.49%

18.77%

-0.28%

MUIGX vs. FNSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUIGX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSTX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUIGX vs. FNSTX - Dividend Comparison

MUIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than FNSTX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.80%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUIGX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund
4.43%4.96%4.60%1.41%1.15%7.64%2.77%14.46%48.57%10.32%5.60%4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUIGX and FNSTX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNSTX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to MUIGX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUIGX dropped -68.10% vs FNSTX's -35.82%.

MUIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUIGX and FNSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer