PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUHLX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MUHLX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MUHLX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
6.53%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%28.98%11.96%14.39%-13.29%17.38%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
8.16%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUHLX achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 8.16% return.


MUHLX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
6.53%
6M
8.32%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
10.41%

YFSIX

1D
-1.07%
1M
-10.67%
YTD
8.16%
6M
0.34%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MUHLX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUHLX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MUHLX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUHLX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUHLXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

0.99

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.16

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.36

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.09

4.42

+2.67

MUHLX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUHLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUHLX and YFSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUHLXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

0.99

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.45

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.71

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between MUHLX and YFSIX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MUHLX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

MUHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
3.13%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MUHLX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUHLX drawdown since its inception was -62.05%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUHLX and YFSIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MUHLXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.05%

-35.10%

-26.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-14.20%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.63%

-25.14%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.88%

-11.03%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.81%

-4.93%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

4.38%

-1.57%

Volatility

MUHLX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) is 5.35%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that MUHLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MUHLXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

9.23%

-3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

19.89%

-8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

21.29%

-4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

15.11%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

16.20%

+0.82%