MUHLX vs. QKACX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) and QKACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MUHLX returned 10.39%/yr vs 16.79%/yr for QKACX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MUHLX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for QKACX.

Performance

MUHLX vs. QKACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with MUHLX at 8.33% and QKACX at 8.33%. Over the past 10 years, MUHLX has underperformed QKACX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while QKACX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.79% annualized return.

MUHLX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 2.79%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 1Y: 17.16%
• 3Y*: 11.19%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

QKACX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.96%
• 6M: 7.25%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 1Y: 17.68%
• 3Y*: 23.29%
• 5Y*: 15.08%
• 10Y*: 16.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUHLX vs. QKACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	8.33%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	8.33%	21.16%	31.05%	23.55%	-14.17%	31.45%	22.00%	26.88%	-2.65%	21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MUHLX and QKACX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between MUHLX and QKACX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MUHLX vs. QKACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 29
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

QKACX

QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 48
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUHLX vs. QKACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUHLX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.44	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	2.09	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.29	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	2.09	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	9.07	-3.79

MUHLX vs. QKACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUHLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the QKACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUHLX and QKACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MUHLX vs. QKACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUHLX drawdown since its inception was -62.05%, roughly equal to the maximum QKACX drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUHLX and QKACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUHLX	QKACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.05%	-60.51%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-8.66%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.63%	-19.42%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.63%	-23.05%	+4.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.85%	-36.47%	-4.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.32%	0.00%	-6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.76%	-11.15%	+0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	1.99%	+1.23%

Volatility

MUHLX vs. QKACX - Volatility Comparison

Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUHLX	QKACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	3.91%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.99%	10.06%	+0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.52%	12.60%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	17.43%	-2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	18.62%	-1.59%

MUHLX vs. QKACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUHLX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than QKACX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUHLX vs. QKACX - Dividend Comparison

MUHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than QKACX's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	3.08%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	4.36%	4.72%	8.90%	1.45%	11.20%	17.85%	3.09%	3.41%	8.83%	0.74%	0.00%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUHLX and QKACX in my portfolio?

MUHLX and QKACX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUHLX or QKACX?

QKACX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to MUHLX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUHLX dropped -62.05% vs QKACX's -60.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QKACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.