MUFG vs. ACN
MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.) and ACN (Accenture plc) are both stocks. MUFG operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while ACN operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MUFG returned 18.66%/yr vs 5.50%/yr for ACN. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MUFG vs. ACN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUFG achieves a 27.11% return, which is significantly higher than ACN's -35.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MUFG has outperformed ACN with an annualized return of 18.66%, while ACN has yielded a comparatively lower 5.50% annualized return.
MUFG
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- 27.11%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- 1Y
- 48.94%
- 3Y*
- 46.26%
- 5Y*
- 33.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.66%
ACN
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- -35.62%
- 6M
- -36.39%
- 1Y
- -45.08%
- 3Y*
- -16.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
MUFG vs. ACN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 27.11% | 39.96% | 40.10% | 33.50% | 27.37% | 25.70% | -15.99% | 11.50% | -33.01% | 20.99% |
ACN Accenture plc | -35.62% | -22.14% | 1.86% | 33.60% | -34.75% | 60.67% | 26.04% | 51.21% | -6.23% | 33.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUFG and ACN is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2001 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MUFG and ACN has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MUFG:
$225.50B
ACN:
$106.02B
MUFG:
¥214.15
ACN:
$12.27
MUFG:
15.08
ACN:
13.88
MUFG:
0.55
ACN:
1.89
MUFG:
2.78
ACN:
1.48
MUFG:
1.61
ACN:
3.40
MUFG:
¥13.21T
ACN:
$72.11B
MUFG:
¥7.24T
ACN:
$23.06B
MUFG:
¥3.34T
ACN:
$12.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUFG vs. ACN — Risk / Return Rank
MUFG
ACN
MUFG vs. ACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) and Accenture plc (ACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUFG | ACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.77 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | -0.94 | +3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | -1.72 | +9.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUFG vs. ACN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUFG drawdown since its inception was -76.75%, which is greater than ACN's maximum drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUFG and ACN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUFG | ACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.75% | -59.20% | -17.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -47.89% | +30.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.56% | -58.67% | +32.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.81% | -58.67% | +25.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.62% | -58.67% | +1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -55.91% | +55.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.53% | -12.89% | -30.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 26.93% | -20.77% |
Volatility
MUFG vs. ACN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) is 5.88%, while Accenture plc (ACN) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that MUFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUFG | ACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 12.95% | -7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.89% | 29.81% | -10.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.81% | 36.02% | -10.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.04% | 28.60% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.85% | 26.87% | +0.98% |
Dividends
MUFG vs. ACN - Dividend Comparison
MUFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than ACN's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACN Accenture plc | 3.74% | 2.26% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 0.87% | 1.26% | 1.07% | 1.98% | 1.66% | 1.97% | 2.03% |
MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 1.12% | 3.12% | 2.50% | 2.90% | 3.36% | 2.18% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.20% | 2.70% | 2.34% |
Financials
MUFG vs. ACN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. and Accenture plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MUFG vs. ACN - Profitability Comparison
MUFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.09T and revenue of 3.59T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.
ACN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported a gross profit of 5.46B and revenue of 18.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.3%.
MUFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 841.39B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
ACN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 18.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.
MUFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 624.99B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
ACN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 18.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MUFG and ACN have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACN has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to MUFG (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUFG dropped -76.75% vs ACN's -59.20%.
MUFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUFG and ACN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer