PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUD vs. METD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MUD vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MUD vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MUD
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
-24.52%-78.75%19.12%
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
12.25%-17.33%-0.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUD achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 12.25% return.


MUD

1D
-4.70%
1M
16.77%
YTD
-24.52%
6M
-59.85%
1Y
-82.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

METD

1D
-6.54%
1M
11.62%
YTD
12.25%
6M
23.48%
1Y
-7.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MUD vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MUD vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUD
MUD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

METD
METD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUD vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUDMETDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.26

-0.20

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.97

0.00

-2.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.67

1.00

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.19

-0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.25

-0.27

-0.98

MUD vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUD Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the METD Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUD and METD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUDMETDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.26

-0.20

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.07

-0.35

-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between MUD and METD is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MUD vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

MUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than METD's 2.43% yield.


TTM20252024
MUD
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
7.81%9.21%0.47%
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
2.43%3.35%2.30%

Drawdowns

MUD vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUD drawdown since its inception was -89.63%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUD and METD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MUDMETDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.63%

-46.03%

-43.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.63%

-39.89%

-49.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.10%

-27.85%

-58.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.31%

-28.04%

-17.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.64%

29.13%

+36.51%

Volatility

MUD vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 13.49%. This indicates that MUD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MUDMETDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.32%

13.49%

+8.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.43%

26.76%

+22.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.07%

40.30%

+24.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.70%

36.27%

+27.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.70%

36.27%

+27.43%