MUBFX vs. LEXCX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX).
MUBFX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jan 21, 1971. LEXCX is managed by Voya. It was launched on Nov 18, 1935.
Performance
MUBFX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MUBFX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | -1.97% | 14.74% | 10.72% | 9.62% | -4.54% | 28.60% | 13.62% | 31.67% | -6.89% | 22.71% |
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund | 15.27% | 7.04% | 3.60% | 14.53% | 3.95% | 26.77% | 4.36% | 21.43% | -5.44% | 16.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUBFX achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than LEXCX's 15.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MUBFX having a 12.18% annualized return and LEXCX not far behind at 11.87%.
MUBFX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 9.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
LEXCX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 6M
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUBFX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MUBFX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank
MUBFX
LEXCX
MUBFX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUBFX | LEXCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 0.92 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.41 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.07 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 3.63 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUBFX | LEXCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.92 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.74 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.64 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.53 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MUBFX and LEXCX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MUBFX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison
MUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than LEXCX's 1.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | 7.53% | 7.38% | 5.24% | 4.49% | 5.82% | 81.14% | 3.79% | 8.43% | 11.90% | 11.15% | 2.53% | 19.99% |
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.66% | 1.58% | 1.65% | 1.54% | 1.91% | 1.86% | 2.03% | 1.79% | 3.93% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
MUBFX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUBFX drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, which is greater than LEXCX's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUBFX and LEXCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUBFX | LEXCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -50.42% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -12.78% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.61% | -19.75% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.31% | -39.21% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.59% | -0.86% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -7.14% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.76% | -1.21% |
Volatility
MUBFX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) is 3.13%, while Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that MUBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MUBFX | LEXCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 3.34% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.07% | 9.44% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 17.75% | -2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 16.39% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 18.90% | -0.99% |