MUB vs. SCMB
MUB (iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - MUB tracks the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index while SCMB tracks the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MUB returned 3.43%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for SCMB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MUB charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.
Performance
MUB vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUB achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.07% return.
MUB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
SCMB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUB vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 1.24% | 3.78% | 1.26% | 5.56% | 2.51% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 1.07% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUB and SCMB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MUB and SCMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUB vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
MUB
SCMB
MUB vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUB | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.50 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.36 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 7.89 | +0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUB | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.34 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.97 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
MUB vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUB and SCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUB | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.68% | -6.13% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -2.92% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.34% | -5.57% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.87% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -1.32% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.87% | -0.08% |
Volatility
MUB vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) is 0.97%, while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that MUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUB | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 1.04% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.22% | 2.17% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 2.94% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 4.16% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 4.16% | +0.76% |
MUB vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MUB vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than SCMB's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.17% | 3.14% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.54% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUB and SCMB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCMB has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to MUB (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUB dropped -13.68% vs SCMB's -6.13%.
On 3-year performance, MUB leads with 3.43% vs 3.37% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MUB has performed better with a 3.43% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for MUB.
SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.17% for MUB.
MUB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MUB and 0.03% for SCMB.
MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUB and SCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer