PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. SITM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MU vs. SITM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and SiTime Corporation (SITM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 296.90% return, which is significantly higher than SITM's 90.32% return.


MU

1D
-6.69%
1M
16.61%
YTD
296.90%
6M
297.93%
1Y
809.78%
3Y*
158.00%
5Y*
69.89%
10Y*
56.72%

SITM

1D
-0.52%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
90.32%
6M
78.25%
1Y
215.69%
3Y*
77.17%
5Y*
39.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. SITM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
296.90%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%15.46%
SITM
SiTime Corporation
90.32%64.63%75.73%20.13%-65.26%161.36%338.94%96.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and SITM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019

0.51

The correlation between MU and SITM shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MU:

$1.29T

SITM:

$17.71B

EPS

MU:

$44.42

SITM:

-$0.94

PS Ratio

MU:

14.25

SITM:

45.64

PB Ratio

MU:

12.84

SITM:

15.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

MU:

$90.27B

SITM:

$379.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MU:

$65.51B

SITM:

$211.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

MU:

$44.96B

SITM:

-$13.71M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. SITM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SITM
SITM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SITM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SITM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. SITM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and SiTime Corporation (SITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUSITMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.40

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

26.71

7.29

+19.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

103.68

18.12

+85.56

MU vs. SITM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 10.86, which is higher than the SITM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and SITM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MU vs. SITM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than SITM's maximum drawdown of -78.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and SITM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSITMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-78.12%

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-30.59%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-55.26%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-78.12%

+20.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.69%

-25.43%

+18.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.11%

-36.67%

-21.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.89%

12.29%

-4.40%

Volatility

MU vs. SITM - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 36.77% compared to SiTime Corporation (SITM) at 23.35%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SITM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSITMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.77%

23.35%

+13.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.80%

57.55%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.47%

76.05%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.50%

76.35%

-21.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.65%

80.47%

-29.82%

Dividends

MU vs. SITM - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while SITM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.04%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
SITM
SiTime Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MU vs. SITM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and SiTime Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
41.46B
113.57M
(MU) Total Revenue
(SITM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MU vs. SITM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Micron Technology, Inc. and SiTime Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
84.6%
59.0%
Portfolio components
MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

SITM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 66.96M and revenue of 113.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

SITM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of -12.34M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.

SITM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of -5.22M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MU and SITM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (36.77%) compared to SITM (23.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs SITM's -78.12%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.86 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and SITM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer