MU vs. IAG
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) and IAG (IAMGOLD Corporation) are both stocks. MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while IAG operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MU returned 54.18%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for IAG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MU vs. IAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 243.32% return, which is significantly higher than IAG's -7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed IAG with an annualized return of 54.18%, while IAG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.59% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 183.94%
- YTD
- 243.32%
- 1Y
- 687.66%
- 3Y*
- 149.71%
- 5Y*
- 66.39%
- 10Y*
- 54.18%
IAG
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- 6M
- -10.98%
- YTD
- -7.10%
- 1Y
- 117.30%
- 3Y*
- 78.58%
- 5Y*
- 39.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
MU vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 243.32% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | -7.10% | 219.57% | 103.95% | -1.94% | -17.57% | -14.71% | -1.61% | 1.36% | -36.88% | 51.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and IAG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2003 | 0.11 |
The correlation between MU and IAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (10 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MU:
$1.11T
IAG:
$8.85B
MU:
$44.42
IAG:
$1.73
MU:
22.05
IAG:
8.87
MU:
0.08
IAG:
0.05
MU:
12.33
IAG:
2.62
MU:
11.10
IAG:
2.10
MU:
$90.27B
IAG:
$3.42B
MU:
$65.51B
IAG:
$1.64B
MU:
$44.96B
IAG:
$1.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank
MU
IAG
MU vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.31 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.23 | 3.06 | +20.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 83.25 | 6.68 | +76.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, roughly equal to the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and IAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -95.55% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -39.60% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -39.60% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -73.69% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -86.46% | +28.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.29% | -37.65% | +18.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.07% | -56.11% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.43% | 18.10% | -9.67% |
Volatility
MU vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 33.63% compared to IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) at 18.59%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.63% | 18.59% | +15.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.19% | 50.34% | +11.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.68% | 62.39% | +13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.75% | 60.72% | -5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.65% | 58.63% | -7.98% |
Dividends
MU vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
MU vs. IAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MU vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
IAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
IAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
IAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and IAG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to IAG (18.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs IAG's -95.55%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and IAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer