MU vs. CHAT
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, MU returned 144.69%/yr vs 48.02%/yr for CHAT. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MU vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 244.07% return, which is significantly higher than CHAT's 57.97% return.
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 35.46%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 751.18%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
CHAT
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 8.95%
- YTD
- 57.97%
- 6M
- 60.59%
- 1Y
- 113.65%
- 3Y*
- 48.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 244.07% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 32.10% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 57.97% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and CHAT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between MU and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
MU
CHAT
MU vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.50 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 24.91 | 6.79 | +18.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 94.64 | 19.03 | +75.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -31.34% | -66.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -16.28% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -31.34% | -26.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.07% | -9.97% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.16% | -5.39% | -52.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 5.80% | +2.15% |
Volatility
MU vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 16.40%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.86% | 16.40% | +16.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.74% | 28.00% | +29.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.66% | 33.14% | +36.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.18% | 30.65% | +22.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.12% | 30.65% | +19.47% |
Dividends
MU vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than CHAT's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.80% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and CHAT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to CHAT (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 3.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer