PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. APP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MU vs. APP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and AppLovin Corporation (APP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 244.07% return, which is significantly higher than APP's -26.28% return.


MU

1D
-1.43%
1M
35.46%
YTD
244.07%
6M
307.41%
1Y
751.18%
3Y*
144.69%
5Y*
66.21%
10Y*
55.83%

APP

1D
3.80%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-26.28%
6M
-25.93%
1Y
36.29%
3Y*
180.45%
5Y*
43.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. APP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
244.07%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%2.99%
APP
AppLovin Corporation
-26.28%108.08%712.62%278.44%-88.83%34.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and APP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.35

The correlation between MU and APP shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MU:

$1.12T

APP:

$168.27B

EPS

MU:

$21.26

APP:

$11.64

PE Ratio

MU:

46.18

APP:

42.68

PEG Ratio

MU:

0.17

APP:

0.13

PS Ratio

MU:

19.16

APP:

27.44

PB Ratio

MU:

15.44

APP:

71.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

MU:

$58.12B

APP:

$6.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MU:

$33.96B

APP:

$5.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

MU:

$25.99B

APP:

$4.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. APP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

APP
APP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
APP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
APP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
APP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
APP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. APP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and AppLovin Corporation (APP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUAPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.13

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.91

0.61

+24.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

94.64

1.22

+93.41

MU vs. APP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 10.83, which is higher than the APP Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and APP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MU vs. APP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than APP's maximum drawdown of -91.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and APP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUAPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-91.90%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-49.99%

+19.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-57.00%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-91.90%

+34.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-32.28%

+23.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-42.52%

-15.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

25.10%

-17.15%

Volatility

MU vs. APP - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to AppLovin Corporation (APP) at 20.54%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUAPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.86%

20.54%

+12.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.74%

58.87%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.66%

71.03%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.18%

77.84%

-24.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.12%

77.53%

-27.41%

Dividends

MU vs. APP - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while APP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
APP
AppLovin Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

MU vs. APP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and AppLovin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.86B
1.84B
(MU) Total Revenue
(APP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MU vs. APP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Micron Technology, Inc. and AppLovin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
74.4%
89.0%
Portfolio components
MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

APP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.0%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

APP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.44B and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 78.2%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.

APP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported a net income of 1.21B and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 65.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MU and APP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to APP (20.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs APP's -91.90%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and APP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer