MU vs. AGI
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) and AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while AGI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MU returned 51.33%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for AGI. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MU vs. AGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 188.53% return, which is significantly higher than AGI's -27.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed AGI with an annualized return of 51.33%, while AGI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.25% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
AGI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- 6M
- -24.43%
- YTD
- -27.72%
- 1Y
- 14.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.64M | $126.71M | $144.32M | |
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B |
MU vs. AGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -27.72% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 34.33% | 33.11% | -11.00% | 46.75% | 68.42% | -44.49% | -4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and AGI is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2003 | 0.09 |
The correlation between MU and AGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (10 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MU:
$929.52B
AGI:
$11.69B
MU:
$44.42
AGI:
$2.76
MU:
18.53
AGI:
10.07
MU:
0.07
AGI:
0.07
MU:
10.36
AGI:
5.32
MU:
9.33
AGI:
2.44
MU:
$90.27B
AGI:
$2.21B
MU:
$65.51B
AGI:
$1.33B
MU:
$44.96B
AGI:
$1.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. AGI — Risk / Return Rank
MU
AGI
MU vs. AGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.09 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.92 | 0.30 | +16.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 64.08 | 0.70 | +63.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. AGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than AGI's maximum drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and AGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -88.13% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.10% | -49.60% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -49.60% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -49.60% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -67.81% | +10.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.17% | -49.60% | +17.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.02% | -37.77% | -20.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.31% | 21.26% | -10.95% |
Volatility
MU vs. AGI - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 31.11% compared to Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) at 11.71%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.11% | 11.71% | +19.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.64% | 44.49% | +23.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.13% | 54.01% | +27.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.32% | 41.86% | +14.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.42% | 48.43% | +2.99% |
Dividends
MU vs. AGI - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than AGI's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.47% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MU vs. AGI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MU vs. AGI - Profitability Comparison
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 342.96M and revenue of 579.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 345.99M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.8%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 263.53M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in a net margin of 45.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and AGI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to AGI (11.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs AGI's -88.13%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and AGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer