PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUM vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUM vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 24.09% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 2.06% return.


MTUM

1D
-1.08%
1M
-3.65%
6M
25.72%
YTD
24.09%
1Y
29.47%
3Y*
30.12%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
16.09%
ALL TIME*
15.89%

MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.75%
YTD
2.06%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$580.98K$555.61K$727.31K
$622.03M$632.13M$558.17M

MTUM vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
24.09%22.15%2.51%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
2.06%4.13%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and MMKT is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

-0.03

The correlation between MTUM and MMKT shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUM vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTUM vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTUMMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-68.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

19.26

-18.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

152.70

-151.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

1,128.57

-1,122.06

MTUM vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 17.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTUMMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-0.04%

-34.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

-0.02%

-17.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.21%

0.00%

-10.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

0.00%

-6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

0.00%

+4.54%

Volatility

MTUM vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.06%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTUMMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.01%

0.06%

+10.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.52%

0.13%

+23.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.78%

0.21%

+25.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

0.23%

+21.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

0.23%

+21.53%

MTUM vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTUM vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than MMKT's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.64%3.98%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUM and MMKT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to MMKT (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

On 1-year performance, MTUM leads with 29.47% vs 3.70% for MMKT. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 29.47% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.54 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer