MTUM vs. JEPQ
MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MTUM returned 28.98%/yr vs 17.64%/yr for JEPQ. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
MTUM vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 5.52% return.
MTUM
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- 6M
- 20.16%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.84%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $411.15M | $392.07M | $419.06M | |
| $620.00M | $622.73M | $495.72M |
MTUM vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 22.65% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -1.18% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.52% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUM and JEPQ is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MTUM and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
MTUM vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTUM
JEPQ
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MTUM
JEPQ
Industrials
MTUM
JEPQ
Energy
MTUM
JEPQ
Financial Services
MTUM
JEPQ
Communication Services
MTUM
JEPQ
Healthcare
MTUM
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
MTUM
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
MTUM
JEPQ
Basic Materials
MTUM
JEPQ
Real Estate
MTUM
JEPQ
Utilities
MTUM
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUM vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
MTUM
JEPQ
MTUM vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTUM | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.97 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | 8.72 | -1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTUM vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUM | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -20.07% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -8.82% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -20.07% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.25% | -4.71% | -6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -3.37% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 1.99% | +1.88% |
Volatility
MTUM vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 11.65% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 5.63%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUM | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.65% | 5.63% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.19% | 11.56% | +10.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.47% | 14.13% | +10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 16.84% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 16.84% | +4.76% |
MTUM vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTUM vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than JEPQ's 10.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.80% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUM and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (11.65%) compared to JEPQ (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 28.98% vs 17.64% for JEPQ. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 28.98% return vs 17.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.80%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUM and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer