PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUM vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUM vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than AVUV's 22.73% return.


MTUM

1D
1.69%
1M
5.58%
YTD
29.72%
6M
30.51%
1Y
42.02%
3Y*
33.16%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.15%

AVUV

1D
0.96%
1M
5.11%
YTD
22.73%
6M
19.51%
1Y
42.12%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
29.72%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%5.46%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
22.73%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and AVUV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.58

The correlation between MTUM and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MTUM vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MTUM
AVUV

Technology

44.4%
7.0%

Industrials

15.6%
13.9%

Financial Services

10.4%
25.8%

Communication Services

7.4%
2.8%

Healthcare

6.9%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
18.0%

Energy

3.5%
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.9%

Utilities

1.6%
0.1%

Technology

MTUM
44.4%
AVUV
7.0%

Industrials

MTUM
15.6%
AVUV
13.9%

Financial Services

MTUM
10.4%
AVUV
25.8%

Communication Services

MTUM
7.4%
AVUV
2.8%

Healthcare

MTUM
6.9%
AVUV
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
3.6%
AVUV
18.0%

Energy

MTUM
3.5%
AVUV
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.3%
AVUV
4.5%

Real Estate

MTUM
1.8%
AVUV
0.7%

Basic Materials

MTUM
1.7%
AVUV
4.9%

Utilities

MTUM
1.6%
AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUM vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTUMAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

5.06

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

15.09

-1.43

MTUM vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTUMAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-49.42%

+15.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-7.95%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-28.79%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-28.79%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

0.00%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-7.91%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.67%

+0.32%

Volatility

MTUM vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.53%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTUMAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.89%

4.53%

+6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.63%

11.34%

+7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.87%

17.63%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

22.75%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

28.26%

-7.06%

MTUM vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTUM vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than AVUV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUM and AVUV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 14.96% vs 11.57% for AVUV. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 14.96% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer