MTUM vs. ARKG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while ARKG is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by ARK. MTUM is passively managed, while ARKG is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 17.15%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for ARKG. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKG.

Performance

MTUM vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than ARKG's 15.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed ARKG with an annualized return of 17.15%, while ARKG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.

MTUM

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 8.76%
• YTD: 29.72%
• 6M: 30.51%
• 1Y: 42.02%
• 3Y*: 33.16%
• 5Y*: 14.96%
• 10Y*: 17.15%

ARKG

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 18.90%
• YTD: 15.53%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 42.61%
• 3Y*: -1.68%
• 5Y*: -17.27%
• 10Y*: 7.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	29.72%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	29.86%	27.25%	-1.67%	37.50%
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	15.53%	23.04%	-28.24%	16.22%	-53.90%	-33.92%	180.40%	44.00%	-1.26%	46.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and ARKG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014	0.56

The correlation between MTUM and ARKG shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MTUM vs. ARKG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MTUM	ARKG
Technology	50.2%	-
Industrials	15.0%	-
Energy	10.5%	-
Communication Services	5.1%	-
Financial Services	5.0%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Healthcare	3.5%	99.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Utilities	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

MTUM vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 73
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 70
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

ARKG

ARKG Risk / Return Rank: 32
ARKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ARKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ARKG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ARKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
ARKG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTUM	ARKG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	0.99	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.62	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.18	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	1.52	+2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.66	3.61	+10.04

MTUM vs. ARKG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the ARKG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and ARKG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and ARKG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTUM	ARKG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.08%	-83.59%	+49.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-27.51%	+15.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.99%	-51.96%	+30.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.28%	-80.18%	+47.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.08%	-83.59%	+49.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-70.05%	+68.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.20%	-35.95%	+29.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	11.53%	-8.54%

Volatility

MTUM vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) is 10.89%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 15.35%. This indicates that MTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTUM	ARKG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.89%	15.35%	-4.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.63%	30.29%	-11.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.87%	42.16%	-21.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	45.81%	-24.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	41.24%	-20.04%

MTUM vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTUM vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	0.85%	3.14%	0.82%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.61%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTUM and ARKG in my portfolio?

MTUM and ARKG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTUM or ARKG?

ARKG has higher volatility (15.35%) compared to MTUM (10.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs ARKG's -83.59%.

Which ETF is better, MTUM or ARKG?

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.15% vs 7.82% for ARKG. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 10.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTUM or ARKG?

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTUM or ARKG?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTUM or ARKG?

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.

What is the main difference between MTUM and ARKG?

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while ARKG is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.75% for ARKG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.