MTUL vs. QQQA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MTUL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUL is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MTUL returned 20.57%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for QQQA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MTUL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.

Performance

MTUL vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUL achieves a 66.24% return, which is significantly higher than QQQA's 62.20% return.

MTUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 15.33%
• YTD: 66.24%
• 6M: 58.06%
• 1Y: 80.22%
• 3Y*: 59.11%
• 5Y*: 20.57%
• 10Y*: —

QQQA

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 9.62%
• YTD: 62.20%
• 6M: 58.27%
• 1Y: 82.44%
• 3Y*: 32.99%
• 5Y*: 13.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUL vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN	66.24%	27.42%	58.70%	10.66%	-37.97%	24.43%
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	62.20%	9.87%	16.17%	24.98%	-29.08%	9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUL and QQQA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021	0.83

The correlation between MTUL and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTUL vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUL

MTUL Risk / Return Rank: 63
MTUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
MTUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MTUL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
MTUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MTUL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

QQQA

QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 88
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 84
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUL vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTUL	QQQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	2.74	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	3.21	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.45	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	5.70	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.25	20.29	-7.05

MTUL vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUL and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTUL vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUL drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, which is greater than QQQA's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUL and QQQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTUL	QQQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.83%	-38.44%	-18.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.86%	-14.54%	-9.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.15%	-30.84%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.83%	-38.44%	-18.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.87%	-7.30%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.47%	-15.54%	-6.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.08%	4.08%	+2.00%

Volatility

MTUL vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a higher volatility of 19.87% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) at 17.19%. This indicates that MTUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTUL	QQQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.87%	17.19%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.27%	26.69%	+13.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.32%	30.24%	+17.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.48%	26.72%	+16.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.10%	26.54%	+17.56%

MTUL vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTUL vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	0.06%	0.10%	0.09%	0.34%	0.28%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTUL and QQQA in my portfolio?

MTUL and QQQA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTUL or QQQA?

MTUL has higher volatility (19.87%) compared to QQQA (17.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUL dropped -56.83% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

Which ETF is better, MTUL or QQQA?

On 5-year performance, MTUL leads with 20.57% vs 13.98% for QQQA. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QQQA has been the lower-risk option at 17.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTUL or QQQA?

Over the 5-year period, MTUL has performed better with a 20.57% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTUL or QQQA?

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MTUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTUL or QQQA?

QQQA has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for MTUL.

What is the main difference between MTUL and QQQA?

MTUL is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. MTUL tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: UBS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MTUL and 0.58% for QQQA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.