PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTUL vs. FECGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MTULFECGX
YTD Return39.90%5.42%
1Y Return71.86%18.30%
3Y Return (Ann)5.74%-1.89%
Sharpe Ratio2.471.03
Daily Std Dev30.40%19.78%
Max Drawdown-56.83%-41.85%
Current Drawdown-15.02%-18.98%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between MTUL and FECGX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

MTUL vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MTUL achieves a 39.90% return, which is significantly higher than FECGX's 5.42% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.75%
-16.50%
MTUL
FECGX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund

MTUL vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
Expense ratio chart for MTUL: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FECGX: current value at 0.05% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.05%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTUL vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTUL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTUL, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTUL, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MTUL, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTUL, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MTUL, currently valued at 13.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0013.47
FECGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FECGX, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FECGX, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FECGX, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FECGX, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FECGX, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.72

MTUL vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MTUL and FECGX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.47
1.03
MTUL
FECGX

Dividends

MTUL vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


TTM20232022202120202019
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.77%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%

Drawdowns

MTUL vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUL drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUL and FECGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-15.02%
-18.98%
MTUL
FECGX

Volatility

MTUL vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) at 5.07%. This indicates that MTUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.01%
5.07%
MTUL
FECGX