PortfoliosLab logo
MTUL vs. FECGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MTUL and FECGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MTUL vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTUL:

0.61

FECGX:

0.18

Sortino Ratio

MTUL:

1.18

FECGX:

0.49

Omega Ratio

MTUL:

1.16

FECGX:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

MTUL:

0.83

FECGX:

0.17

Martin Ratio

MTUL:

2.72

FECGX:

0.56

Ulcer Index

MTUL:

11.99%

FECGX:

9.70%

Daily Std Dev

MTUL:

48.09%

FECGX:

25.98%

Max Drawdown

MTUL:

-56.83%

FECGX:

-43.43%

Current Drawdown

MTUL:

-5.04%

FECGX:

-17.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUL achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than FECGX's -4.22% return.


MTUL

YTD

13.92%

1M

31.42%

6M

11.75%

1Y

29.23%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FECGX

YTD

-4.22%

1M

15.24%

6M

-5.82%

1Y

4.72%

5Y*

8.62%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MTUL vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTUL vs. FECGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTUL is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTUL is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTUL is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTUL is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTUL is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTUL is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FECGX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FECGX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FECGX is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FECGX is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FECGX is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FECGX is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTUL vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MTUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUL and FECGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MTUL vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


TTM202420232022202120202019
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
1.31%1.25%0.81%0.80%0.57%0.38%0.24%

Drawdowns

MTUL vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUL drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUL and FECGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MTUL vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a higher volatility of 11.05% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) at 6.91%. This indicates that MTUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...