MTUL vs. AMUB
MTUL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN) and AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUL is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while AMUB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MTUL returned 15.37%/yr vs 15.69%/yr for AMUB. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MTUL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for AMUB.
Performance
MTUL vs. AMUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUL achieves a 39.46% return, which is significantly higher than AMUB's 22.57% return.
MTUL
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -12.41%
- 6M
- 34.68%
- YTD
- 39.46%
- 1Y
- 51.48%
- 3Y*
- 48.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.44%
AMUB
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- YTD
- 22.57%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.19K | $8.67K | $19.34K | |
| $205.26K | $149.84K | $116.28K |
MTUL vs. AMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN | 39.46% | 27.42% | 58.70% | 10.66% | -37.97% | 8.34% |
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 22.57% | 2.05% | 15.68% | 16.89% | 21.91% | 17.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUL and AMUB is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.36 |
The correlation between MTUL and AMUB shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUL vs. AMUB — Risk / Return Rank
MTUL
AMUB
MTUL vs. AMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTUL | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.80 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 4.91 | +1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTUL vs. AMUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUL drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, smaller than the maximum AMUB drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUL and AMUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUL | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.83% | -79.46% | +22.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.27% | -11.02% | -21.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.15% | -17.22% | -21.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.83% | -20.58% | -36.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.93% | -1.66% | -20.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -28.86% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.91% | 4.36% | +3.55% |
Volatility
MTUL vs. AMUB - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a higher volatility of 26.68% compared to ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) at 4.81%. This indicates that MTUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUL | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.68% | 4.81% | +21.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.98% | 11.07% | +38.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.35% | 14.37% | +41.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.41% | 19.86% | +25.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.64% | 27.19% | +18.45% |
MTUL vs. AMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTUL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUB's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTUL vs. AMUB - Dividend Comparison
Neither MTUL nor AMUB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUL and AMUB have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUL has higher volatility (26.68%) compared to AMUB (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUL dropped -56.83% vs AMUB's -79.46%.
On 5-year performance, AMUB leads with 15.69% vs 15.37% for MTUL. On fees, AMUB is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, AMUB has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMUB has performed better with a 15.69% return vs 15.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMUB is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MTUL.
MTUL and AMUB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MTUL is categorized as Momentum, while AMUB is MLPs. MTUL tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MTUL and 0.80% for AMUB.
AMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUL and AMUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer