MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO
MTRX.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF) and BGIN.NEO (BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series) are both Technology Equities funds. MTRX.TO is passively managed, while BGIN.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, MTRX.TO returned 83.71% vs 84.48% for BGIN.NEO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTRX.TO charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for BGIN.NEO.
Performance
MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTRX.TO achieves a 38.57% return, which is significantly lower than BGIN.NEO's 51.05% return.
MTRX.TO
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 38.57%
- 6M
- 37.27%
- 1Y
- 83.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGIN.NEO
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 51.05%
- 6M
- 49.76%
- 1Y
- 84.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF | 38.57% | 37.29% |
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series | 51.05% | 12.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTRX.TO and BGIN.NEO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between MTRX.TO and BGIN.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
MTRX.TO
BGIN.NEO
MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTRX.TO | BGIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.61 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.69 | 6.42 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.58 | 20.31 | -0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTRX.TO | BGIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 3.26 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.05 | 1.52 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTRX.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum BGIN.NEO drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRX.TO and BGIN.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTRX.TO | BGIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.75% | -29.19% | +9.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -13.23% | -1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -2.25% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -4.44% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 4.17% | +0.12% |
Volatility
MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) have volatilities of 9.59% and 9.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTRX.TO | BGIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 9.75% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.58% | 21.54% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.19% | 26.04% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.78% | 26.12% | +5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.78% | 26.12% | +5.66% |
MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTRX.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIN.NEO's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTRX.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison
MTRX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BGIN.NEO's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.12% |
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTRX.TO and BGIN.NEO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTRX.TO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTRX.TO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MTRX.TO and 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.
Find the right allocation for MTRX.TO and BGIN.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer