PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTRN vs. ARRNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTRN vs. ARRNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materion Corporation (MTRN) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRN achieves a 81.69% return, which is significantly higher than ARRNF's 35.21% return.


MTRN

1D
2.16%
1M
13.19%
YTD
81.69%
6M
83.28%
1Y
183.57%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
24.37%
10Y*
25.24%

ARRNF

1D
1.45%
1M
1.41%
YTD
35.21%
6M
8.17%
1Y
60.51%
3Y*
37.22%
5Y*
70.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTRN vs. ARRNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MTRN
Materion Corporation
81.69%26.43%-23.67%49.41%-4.25%45.18%3.66%
ARRNF
American Rare Earths Limited
35.21%23.89%41.25%-11.60%4.42%550.00%-20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRN and ARRNF is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTRN:

$4.74B

ARRNF:

$158.25M

EPS

MTRN:

$3.65

ARRNF:

-$0.02

PB Ratio

MTRN:

4.95

ARRNF:

3.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTRN:

$1.91B

ARRNF:

-$128.85K

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTRN:

$305.29M

ARRNF:

-$385.87K

EBITDA (TTM)

MTRN:

$166.65M

ARRNF:

-$12.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTRN vs. ARRNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRN
MTRN Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ARRNF
ARRNF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ARRNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARRNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARRNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ARRNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARRNF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRN vs. ARRNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materion Corporation (MTRN) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTRNARRNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.24

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.91

0.88

+8.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.70

1.23

+26.47

MTRN vs. ARRNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRN Sharpe Ratio is 4.26, which is higher than the ARRNF Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRN and ARRNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTRNARRNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26

0.48

+3.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.22

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.18

-0.05

Drawdowns

MTRN vs. ARRNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRN drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, which is greater than ARRNF's maximum drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRN and ARRNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTRNARRNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.53%

-83.01%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.73%

-69.13%

+48.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.84%

-69.13%

+21.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.84%

-83.01%

+35.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-58.26%

+56.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-46.26%

+6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

49.30%

-42.64%

Volatility

MTRN vs. ARRNF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Materion Corporation (MTRN) is 11.86%, while American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) has a volatility of 23.76%. This indicates that MTRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARRNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTRNARRNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.86%

23.76%

-11.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.38%

49.76%

-17.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.43%

126.61%

-83.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.17%

314.61%

-273.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.13%

290.23%

-250.10%

Dividends

MTRN vs. ARRNF - Dividend Comparison

MTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while ARRNF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARRNF
American Rare Earths Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTRN
Materion Corporation
0.25%0.45%0.54%0.40%0.57%0.52%0.71%0.73%0.92%0.81%0.95%1.27%

Financials

MTRN vs. ARRNF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Materion Corporation and American Rare Earths Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
549.82M
0
(MTRN) Total Revenue
(ARRNF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MTRN and ARRNF have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARRNF has higher volatility (23.76%) compared to MTRN (11.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTRN dropped -87.53% vs ARRNF's -83.01%.

MTRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTRN and ARRNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer