MTRA vs. AVEM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MTRA (Invesco International Growth Focus ETF) and AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTRA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Invesco, while AVEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MTRA returned 9.61% vs 33.47% for AVEM. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MTRA charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVEM.

Performance

MTRA vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRA achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 16.96% return.

MTRA

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.71%
• 6M: -1.48%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.78%

AVEM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -3.17%
• 6M: 8.33%
• YTD: 16.96%
• 1Y: 33.47%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$186.43M	$193.15M	$184.15M
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	$230.43K	$226.21K	$171.07K

MTRA vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	1.23%	4.16%
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	16.96%	17.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRA and AVEM is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025	0.83

The correlation between MTRA and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTRA vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTRA

MTRA Risk / Return Rank: 21
MTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

AVEM

AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 60
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTRA vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTRA	AVEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	1.36	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	1.86	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.26	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	2.27	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	7.27	-5.74

MTRA vs. AVEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the AVEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRA and AVEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTRA vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRA drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, smaller than the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRA and AVEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRA	AVEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-36.05%	+20.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.77%	-14.28%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-10.65%	+6.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-10.02%	+6.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	4.45%	+0.87%

Volatility

MTRA vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) is 6.07%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that MTRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRA	AVEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	8.84%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.75%	21.85%	-5.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.14%	23.91%	-4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.58%	19.33%	-0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.58%	21.07%	-2.49%

MTRA vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRA has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTRA vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison

MTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than AVEM's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.96%	2.45%	3.17%	3.06%	2.77%	2.61%	1.60%	0.35%
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	0.68%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTRA and AVEM in my portfolio?

MTRA and AVEM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTRA or AVEM?

AVEM has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to MTRA (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTRA dropped -15.77% vs AVEM's -36.05%.

Which ETF is better, MTRA or AVEM?

On 1-year performance, AVEM leads with 33.47% vs 9.61% for MTRA. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, MTRA has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTRA or AVEM?

Over the 1-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 33.47% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTRA or AVEM?

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for MTRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTRA or AVEM?

AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.68% for MTRA.

What is the main difference between MTRA and AVEM?

MTRA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for MTRA and 0.33% for AVEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.