MTPLF vs. MDC
MTPLF (Metaplanet Inc) and MDC (M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — MTPLF in Restaurants, MDC in Residential Construction.
Performance
MTPLF vs. MDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MTPLF
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- -28.57%
- YTD
- -38.00%
- 6M
- -38.00%
- 1Y
- -84.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTPLF vs. MDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MTPLF Metaplanet Inc | -38.00% | 8.70% | 43.75% |
MDC M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTPLF vs. MDC — Risk / Return Rank
MTPLF
MDC
MTPLF vs. MDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metaplanet Inc (MTPLF) and M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. (MDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTPLF | MDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTPLF | MDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MTPLF vs. MDC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTPLF | MDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.90% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.35% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.32% | — | — |
Volatility
MTPLF vs. MDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTPLF | MDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.87% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 156.55% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 156.55% | — | — |
Dividends
MTPLF vs. MDC - Dividend Comparison
Neither MTPLF nor MDC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDC M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.87% | 3.80% | 6.33% | 2.99% | 2.86% | 3.09% | 4.27% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.92% |
MTPLF Metaplanet Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MTPLF vs. MDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metaplanet Inc and M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Find the right allocation for MTPLF and MDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer