PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTPLF vs. HUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTPLF vs. HUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metaplanet Inc (MTPLF) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTPLF achieves a -42.80% return, which is significantly lower than HUT's 162.32% return.


MTPLF

1D
-5.92%
1M
-25.98%
YTD
-42.80%
6M
-51.11%
1Y
-87.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUT

1D
-0.44%
1M
13.80%
YTD
162.32%
6M
129.67%
1Y
658.40%
3Y*
101.87%
5Y*
44.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTPLF vs. HUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MTPLF
Metaplanet Inc
-42.80%8.70%33.33%
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
162.32%124.21%-20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MTPLF and HUT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2024

0.24

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTPLF vs. HUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTPLF
MTPLF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MTPLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTPLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTPLF Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MTPLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTPLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

HUT
HUT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTPLF vs. HUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metaplanet Inc (MTPLF) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTPLFHUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

1.52

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

17.21

-18.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

46.85

-48.08

MTPLF vs. HUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTPLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the HUT Sharpe Ratio of 6.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTPLF and HUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTPLF vs. HUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTPLF drawdown since its inception was -90.88%, roughly equal to the maximum HUT drawdown of -95.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTPLF and HUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTPLFHUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.88%

-95.04%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.88%

-38.62%

-49.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.68%

-9.40%

-81.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.60%

-63.39%

+5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.26%

14.16%

+57.10%

Volatility

MTPLF vs. HUT - Volatility Comparison

Metaplanet Inc (MTPLF) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) have volatilities of 23.91% and 23.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTPLFHUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.91%

23.80%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.58%

73.43%

-7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.74%

102.76%

-12.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

155.13%

105.59%

+49.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

155.13%

114.60%

+40.53%

Dividends

MTPLF vs. HUT - Dividend Comparison

Neither MTPLF nor HUT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MTPLF vs. HUT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metaplanet Inc and Hut 8 Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-300.00M-200.00M-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
71.02M
(MTPLF) Total Revenue
(HUT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MTPLF and HUT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTPLF has higher volatility (23.91%) compared to HUT (23.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTPLF dropped -90.88% vs HUT's -95.04%.

HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.48 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTPLF and HUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer