MTPLF vs. MSTR
MTPLF (Metaplanet Inc) and MSTR (Strategy Inc) are both stocks. MTPLF operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while MSTR operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past year, MTPLF returned -80.25% vs -74.56% for MSTR. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MTPLF vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTPLF achieves a -44.00% return, which is significantly lower than MSTR's -38.61% return.
MTPLF
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- 6M
- -50.53%
- YTD
- -44.00%
- 1Y
- -80.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.70%
MSTR
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- 6M
- -37.69%
- YTD
- -38.61%
- 1Y
- -74.56%
- 3Y*
- 28.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTR Strategy Inc | $1.53B | $1.65B | $2.43B |
MTPLF Metaplanet Inc | $1.04M | $889.48K | $1.63M |
MTPLF vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MTPLF Metaplanet Inc | -44.00% | 8.70% | 33.33% |
MSTR Strategy Inc | -38.61% | -47.53% | -31.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTPLF and MSTR is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2024 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, MTPLF and MSTR have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTPLF vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank
MTPLF
MSTR
MTPLF vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metaplanet Inc (MTPLF) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTPLF | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.78 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.97 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -1.38 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTPLF vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTPLF drawdown since its inception was -92.05%, smaller than the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTPLF and MSTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTPLF | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.05% | -99.86% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.82% | -79.53% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -82.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.88% | -80.31% | -10.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.75% | -86.42% | +26.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.33% | 55.64% | +9.69% |
Volatility
MTPLF vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison
Metaplanet Inc (MTPLF) has a higher volatility of 23.80% compared to Strategy Inc (MSTR) at 18.58%. This indicates that MTPLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTPLF | MSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.80% | 18.58% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.74% | 60.57% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.60% | 75.24% | +16.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.48% | 89.94% | +61.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.48% | 74.33% | +77.15% |
Dividends
MTPLF vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither MTPLF nor MSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MTPLF vs. MSTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metaplanet Inc and Strategy Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MTPLF and MSTR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTPLF has higher volatility (23.80%) compared to MSTR (18.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTPLF dropped -92.05% vs MSTR's -99.86%.
MTPLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTPLF and MSTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer