MTO.L vs. BATS.L
MTO.L (Mitie Group plc) and BATS.L (British American Tobacco plc) are both stocks. MTO.L operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while BATS.L operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MTO.L returned 11.92%/yr vs 6.40%/yr for BATS.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTO.L vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTO.L achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than BATS.L's 13.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MTO.L has outperformed BATS.L with an annualized return of 11.92%, while BATS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.40% annualized return.
MTO.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- YTD
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- 13.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 23.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.89%
BATS.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 29.46%
- 3Y*
- 30.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.91%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
MTO.L vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTO.L Mitie Group plc | -6.58% | 54.51% | 14.98% | 37.53% | 19.48% | 58.37% | 6.42% | 38.07% | -39.52% | -12.71% |
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 13.67% | 56.35% | 37.24% | -23.51% | 28.17% | 9.10% | -9.61% | 38.29% | -47.15% | 12.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTO.L and BATS.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2006 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
MTO.L:
£1.88B
BATS.L:
£100.86B
MTO.L:
£0.14
BATS.L:
£4.93
MTO.L:
11.03
BATS.L:
9.46
MTO.L:
0.28
BATS.L:
0.35
MTO.L:
0.19
BATS.L:
1.98
MTO.L:
3.99
BATS.L:
2.13
MTO.L:
£10.70B
BATS.L:
£51.48B
MTO.L:
£1.15B
BATS.L:
£35.04B
MTO.L:
£593.60M
BATS.L:
£17.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTO.L vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank
MTO.L
BATS.L
MTO.L vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitie Group plc (MTO.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTO.L | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 2.14 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 4.67 | -2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTO.L vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTO.L drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, which is greater than BATS.L's maximum drawdown of -54.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTO.L and BATS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTO.L | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.92% | -54.84% | -26.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.14% | -13.70% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -14.78% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.51% | -29.68% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.81% | -54.84% | -22.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.97% | -4.82% | -12.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -15.39% | -5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 6.29% | +1.10% |
Volatility
MTO.L vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mitie Group plc (MTO.L) is 5.74%, while British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that MTO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTO.L | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 7.92% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 19.03% | -3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.09% | 23.51% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.46% | 20.80% | +9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.92% | 23.94% | +25.98% |
Dividends
MTO.L vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison
MTO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than BATS.L's 5.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 5.21% | 5.70% | 8.18% | 10.06% | 6.64% | 7.89% | 7.77% | 6.28% | 7.81% | 3.48% |
MTO.L Mitie Group plc | 2.98% | 1.80% | 3.91% | 3.22% | 2.82% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 5.35% | 7.02% | 1.34% |
Financials
MTO.L vs. BATS.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitie Group plc and British American Tobacco plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTO.L vs. BATS.L - Profitability Comparison
MTO.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mitie Group plc reported a gross profit of 333.40M and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.3%.
BATS.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a gross profit of 8.28B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
MTO.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mitie Group plc reported an operating income of 99.80M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
BATS.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported an operating income of 5.02B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
MTO.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mitie Group plc reported a net income of 51.10M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
BATS.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTO.L and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MTO.L and BATS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer