PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BATS.L vs. LGEN.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BATS.LLGEN.L
YTD Return26.05%-4.42%
1Y Return17.42%7.76%
3Y Return (Ann)10.65%-1.60%
5Y Return (Ann)7.07%3.58%
10Y Return (Ann)3.48%6.18%
Sharpe Ratio0.910.43
Sortino Ratio1.370.70
Omega Ratio1.201.08
Calmar Ratio0.480.48
Martin Ratio3.721.17
Ulcer Index4.85%6.86%
Daily Std Dev19.68%18.88%
Max Drawdown-64.53%-85.42%
Current Drawdown-19.14%-11.32%

Fundamentals


BATS.LLGEN.L
Market Cap£59.56B£12.83B
EPS-£6.22£0.05
PEG Ratio3.150.00
Total Revenue (TTM)£26.18B£36.93B
Gross Profit (TTM)£19.94B£51.35B
EBITDA (TTM)£12.70B-£552.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between BATS.L and LGEN.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BATS.L vs. LGEN.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BATS.L achieves a 26.05% return, which is significantly higher than LGEN.L's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BATS.L has underperformed LGEN.L with an annualized return of 3.48%, while LGEN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 6.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.51%
-5.10%
BATS.L
LGEN.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BATS.L vs. LGEN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and Legal & General Group plc (LGEN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATS.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BATS.L, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BATS.L, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BATS.L, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BATS.L, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BATS.L, currently valued at 4.78, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.78
LGEN.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LGEN.L, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LGEN.L, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LGEN.L, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LGEN.L, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LGEN.L, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.20

BATS.L vs. LGEN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the LGEN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATS.L and LGEN.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.19
0.66
BATS.L
LGEN.L

Dividends

BATS.L vs. LGEN.L - Dividend Comparison

BATS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, less than LGEN.L's 9.38% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
8.68%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%3.37%3.98%4.14%4.25%
LGEN.L
Legal & General Group plc
9.38%7.82%7.50%5.99%6.60%5.53%6.77%5.36%5.63%4.41%3.94%3.63%

Drawdowns

BATS.L vs. LGEN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATS.L drawdown since its inception was -64.53%, smaller than the maximum LGEN.L drawdown of -85.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATS.L and LGEN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.86%
-13.75%
BATS.L
LGEN.L

Volatility

BATS.L vs. LGEN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) is 4.41%, while Legal & General Group plc (LGEN.L) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that BATS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGEN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.41%
4.93%
BATS.L
LGEN.L

Financials

BATS.L vs. LGEN.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco plc and Legal & General Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items