BATS.L vs. IMB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L).
Performance
BATS.L vs. IMB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BATS.L vs. IMB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 5.21% | 56.35% | 37.24% | -23.51% | 28.17% | 9.10% | -9.61% | 38.29% | -47.15% | 13.39% |
IMB.L Imperial Brands plc | -0.76% | 29.63% | 51.66% | -5.83% | 37.80% | 15.06% | -12.52% | -13.44% | -19.62% | -6.12% |
Fundamentals
BATS.L:
£95.74B
IMB.L:
£25.39B
BATS.L:
£4.91
IMB.L:
£5.64
BATS.L:
8.90
IMB.L:
5.42
BATS.L:
0.33
IMB.L:
2.17
BATS.L:
1.87
IMB.L:
0.68
BATS.L:
2.00
IMB.L:
5.26
BATS.L:
£51.48B
IMB.L:
£37.47B
BATS.L:
£35.04B
IMB.L:
£13.60B
BATS.L:
£17.11B
IMB.L:
£8.33B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATS.L achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than IMB.L's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, BATS.L has outperformed IMB.L with an annualized return of 7.54%, while IMB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.
BATS.L
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 46.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.07%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
IMB.L
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 23.81%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATS.L vs. IMB.L — Risk / Return Rank
BATS.L
IMB.L
BATS.L vs. IMB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) and Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATS.L | IMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 0.60 | +1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 0.92 | +1.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.12 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 0.78 | +2.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.96 | 2.19 | +6.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATS.L | IMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.60 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.21 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.58 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between BATS.L and IMB.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BATS.L vs. IMB.L - Dividend Comparison
BATS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than IMB.L's 5.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 5.52% | 5.70% | 8.18% | 10.06% | 6.64% | 7.89% | 7.77% | 6.28% | 7.81% | 4.35% | 3.37% | 3.98% |
IMB.L Imperial Brands plc | 5.24% | 5.59% | 5.91% | 7.99% | 6.78% | 8.57% | 5.84% | 10.70% | 7.65% | 5.22% | 4.24% | 5.05% |
Drawdowns
BATS.L vs. IMB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATS.L drawdown since its inception was -64.53%, roughly equal to the maximum IMB.L drawdown of -61.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATS.L and IMB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATS.L | IMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.53% | -61.74% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -15.47% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.68% | -22.33% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.44% | -61.74% | +7.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -8.06% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.08% | -14.00% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 5.52% | -0.43% |
Volatility
BATS.L vs. IMB.L - Volatility Comparison
British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L) at 7.32%. This indicates that BATS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BATS.L | IMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.38% | 7.32% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.68% | 14.26% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.67% | 20.69% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 19.28% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 22.73% | +0.90% |
Financials
BATS.L vs. IMB.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco plc and Imperial Brands plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BATS.L vs. IMB.L - Profitability Comparison
BATS.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a gross profit of 8.28B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
IMB.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Imperial Brands plc reported a gross profit of 3.68B and revenue of 10.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.
BATS.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported an operating income of 5.02B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
IMB.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Imperial Brands plc reported an operating income of 2.08B and revenue of 10.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
BATS.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
IMB.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Imperial Brands plc reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 10.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.