MTN vs. VXUS
MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) is a stock, while VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Over the past 10 years, MTN returned 3.06%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for VXUS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTN vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTN achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MTN has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 3.06%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.
MTN
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- -8.71%
- 3Y*
- -14.88%
- 5Y*
- -13.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.06%
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
MTN vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 2.54% | -24.88% | -7.96% | -7.06% | -24.89% | 18.15% | 17.77% | 17.34% | 1.74% | 34.43% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTN and VXUS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2011 | 0.44 |
The correlation between MTN and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTN vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
MTN
VXUS
MTN vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTN | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.39 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 2.85 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 11.14 | -11.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTN | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 2.12 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.53 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.57 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.39 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
MTN vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTN drawdown since its inception was -77.54%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTN and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTN | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.54% | -35.97% | -41.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -11.27% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.41% | -13.58% | -32.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -29.44% | -31.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.17% | -35.97% | -25.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.32% | -0.99% | -55.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.11% | -8.22% | -17.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.64% | 2.88% | +11.76% |
Volatility
MTN vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 5.60%. This indicates that MTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTN | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 5.60% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.27% | 13.00% | +13.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.69% | 15.21% | +18.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.71% | 16.05% | +15.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 17.16% | +15.13% |
Dividends
MTN vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
MTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 6.63% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTN and VXUS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTN has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to VXUS (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTN dropped -77.54% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTN and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer