MTN vs. HLT
MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) and HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — MTN in Resorts & Casinos, HLT in Lodging. Over the past 10 years, MTN returned 3.58%/yr vs 46.64%/yr for HLT. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MTN vs. HLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTN achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than HLT's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MTN has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 3.58%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 46.64% annualized return.
MTN
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 6.87%
- 3Y*
- -9.58%
- 5Y*
- -9.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.95%
HLT
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 23.12%
- 3Y*
- 27.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.83%
- 10Y*
- 46.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $673.09M | $672.71M | $663.95M | |
| $114.83M | $112.88M | $108.20M |
MTN vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 16.20% | -24.88% | -7.96% | -7.06% | -24.89% | 18.15% | 17.77% | 17.34% | 1.74% | 34.43% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 11.68% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTN and HLT is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MTN and HLT has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MTN:
$5.32B
HLT:
$72.13B
MTN:
$6.36
HLT:
$6.75
MTN:
23.49
HLT:
47.50
MTN:
0.57
HLT:
0.77
MTN:
1.26
HLT:
6.03
MTN:
$2.83B
HLT:
$12.49B
MTN:
$2.12B
HLT:
$5.84B
MTN:
$499.82M
HLT:
$2.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTN vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank
MTN
HLT
MTN vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTN | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.16 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.93 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 4.25 | -3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTN vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTN drawdown since its inception was -77.54%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTN and HLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTN | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.54% | -50.82% | -26.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.93% | -10.29% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.73% | -26.35% | -19.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -32.65% | -28.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.17% | -50.82% | -10.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.51% | -8.49% | -42.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.29% | -9.66% | -16.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.57% | 4.69% | +7.88% |
Volatility
MTN vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison
Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 6.92%. This indicates that MTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTN | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 6.92% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.93% | 17.25% | +11.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.18% | 23.28% | +13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.60% | 26.85% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 180.98% | -148.22% |
Dividends
MTN vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison
MTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than HLT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 5.94% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
Financials
MTN vs. HLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vail Resorts, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTN vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison
MTN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 3.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.
MTN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 858.00M and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.
MTN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 482.00M and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTN and HLT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTN has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to HLT (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTN dropped -77.54% vs HLT's -50.82%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTN and HLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer