PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTN vs. MVBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTN vs. MVBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTN achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than MVBF's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MTN has underperformed MVBF with an annualized return of 3.53%, while MVBF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.


MTN

1D
0.51%
1M
11.57%
YTD
9.05%
6M
3.33%
1Y
-4.38%
3Y*
-12.10%
5Y*
-11.79%
10Y*
3.53%

MVBF

1D
1.77%
1M
10.28%
YTD
10.74%
6M
9.89%
1Y
38.12%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
-6.03%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTN vs. MVBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
9.05%-24.88%-7.96%-7.06%-24.89%18.15%17.77%17.34%1.74%34.43%
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.
10.74%28.74%-5.15%5.68%-45.83%85.48%-7.02%39.64%-9.72%57.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MTN and MVBF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2008

0.14

The correlation between MTN and MVBF shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MTN:

$5.62

MVBF:

$2.06

PE Ratio

MTN:

25.34

MVBF:

13.71

PEG Ratio

MTN:

0.62

MVBF:

1.53

PS Ratio

MTN:

1.36

MVBF:

1.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTN:

$2.83B

MVBF:

$196.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTN:

$2.12B

MVBF:

$119.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTN:

$499.82M

MVBF:

$39.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTN vs. MVBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTN
MTN Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MVBF
MVBF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MVBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVBF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MVBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVBF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTN vs. MVBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTNMVBFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.25

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

2.32

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

5.32

-5.61

MTN vs. MVBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTN Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the MVBF Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTN and MVBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTN vs. MVBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTN drawdown since its inception was -77.54%, roughly equal to the maximum MVBF drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTN and MVBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTNMVBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.54%

-75.98%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

-16.50%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.73%

-37.66%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

-60.80%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.17%

-63.71%

+2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.55%

-27.82%

-25.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.20%

-34.70%

+8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.07%

7.18%

+7.89%

Volatility

MTN vs. MVBF - Volatility Comparison

Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) has a higher volatility of 14.71% compared to MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) at 7.39%. This indicates that MTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTNMVBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.71%

7.39%

+7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.60%

20.34%

+7.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.00%

27.36%

+8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.30%

34.71%

-2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.56%

40.07%

-7.51%

Dividends

MTN vs. MVBF - Dividend Comparison

MTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than MVBF's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
6.24%6.69%4.74%3.86%3.21%0.54%0.63%2.94%2.79%1.98%2.01%1.95%
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.
2.41%2.63%3.29%3.01%3.09%1.23%1.59%0.78%0.61%0.37%0.62%0.31%

Financials

MTN vs. MVBF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vail Resorts, Inc. and MVB Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.21B
56.35M
(MTN) Total Revenue
(MVBF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTN vs. MVBF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vail Resorts, Inc. and MVB Financial Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.3%
65.8%
Portfolio components
MTN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.

MVBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 37.10M and revenue of 56.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.8%.

MTN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.

MVBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 5.45M and revenue of 56.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

MTN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.

MVBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MVB Financial Corp. reported a net income of 4.23M and revenue of 56.35M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MTN and MVBF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTN has higher volatility (14.71%) compared to MVBF (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTN dropped -77.54% vs MVBF's -75.98%.

MVBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTN and MVBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer