PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTGP vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTGP vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTGP achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 9.88% return.


MTGP

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.15%
1Y
6.02%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*

DHS

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.38%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTGP vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MTGP
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund
0.21%7.57%2.48%3.96%-11.29%-0.64%4.91%0.05%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
9.88%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MTGP and DHS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.01

The correlation between MTGP and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTGP vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTGP
MTGP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MTGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MTGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTGP Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTGP vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTGPDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.28

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

12.04

-5.68

MTGP vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTGP and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTGPDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.06

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.77

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.41

-0.23

Drawdowns

MTGP vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTGP drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTGP and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTGPDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.63%

-67.25%

+50.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-6.30%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

-11.87%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.63%

-15.28%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-2.60%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-9.55%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.71%

-0.76%

Volatility

MTGP vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) is 1.30%, while WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that MTGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTGPDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

2.88%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

7.32%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78%

10.01%

-5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.79%

13.89%

-8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

16.08%

-10.83%

MTGP vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTGP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

MTGP vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

MTGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than DHS's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.35%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
MTGP
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund
4.32%4.19%4.05%3.02%2.47%1.64%2.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTGP and DHS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHS has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to MTGP (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTGP dropped -16.63% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 5-year performance, DHS leads with 10.59% vs 0.29% for MTGP. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, MTGP has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DHS has performed better with a 10.59% return vs 0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MTGP.

MTGP has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 3.35% for DHS.

MTGP is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MTGP and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTGP and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer