MTD vs. PEP
MTD (Mettler-Toledo International Inc.) and PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) are both stocks. MTD operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while PEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MTD returned 11.73%/yr vs 6.62%/yr for PEP. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTD vs. PEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTD achieves a -18.84% return, which is significantly lower than PEP's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MTD has outperformed PEP with an annualized return of 11.73%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.62% annualized return.
MTD
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- -18.84%
- 6M
- -18.81%
- 1Y
- -2.07%
- 3Y*
- -4.98%
- 5Y*
- -3.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
PEP
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- -2.36%
- 1Y
- 14.62%
- 3Y*
- -4.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.62%
MTD vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | -18.84% | 13.93% | 0.88% | -16.08% | -14.83% | 48.92% | 43.67% | 40.26% | -8.71% | 48.01% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 2.49% | -1.85% | -7.60% | -3.29% | 6.78% | 20.56% | 11.67% | 27.38% | -4.81% | 17.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTD and PEP is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 1997 | 0.25 |
The correlation between MTD and PEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MTD:
$22.95B
PEP:
$197.79B
MTD:
$42.68
PEP:
$6.37
MTD:
26.51
PEP:
22.64
MTD:
4.07
PEP:
7.83
MTD:
5.67
PEP:
2.07
MTD:
6.26
PEP:
9.25
MTD:
$4.09B
PEP:
$95.45B
MTD:
$2.36B
PEP:
$51.60B
MTD:
$1.24B
PEP:
$15.08B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTD vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank
MTD
PEP
MTD vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTD | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.12 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 0.83 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 2.11 | -2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTD vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTD drawdown since its inception was -61.43%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTD and PEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTD | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.43% | -73.92% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.90% | -16.25% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -29.17% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.47% | -30.32% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | -30.32% | -13.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.54% | -17.75% | -15.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.69% | -13.65% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 6.37% | +5.11% |
Volatility
MTD vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison
Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 5.39%. This indicates that MTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTD | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.92% | 5.39% | +4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.16% | 14.62% | +11.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.17% | 21.71% | +10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.15% | 18.39% | +13.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 19.67% | +10.11% |
Dividends
MTD vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison
MTD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 3.98% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
Financials
MTD vs. PEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mettler-Toledo International Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTD vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison
MTD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a gross profit of 555.82M and revenue of 947.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.7%.
PEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.
MTD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported an operating income of 246.22M and revenue of 947.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
PEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
MTD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a net income of 169.45M and revenue of 947.13M, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
PEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTD and PEP have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTD has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to PEP (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTD dropped -61.43% vs PEP's -73.92%.
PEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTD and PEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer