PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSXAX vs. PLSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSXAX vs. PLSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MSXAX having a 11.46% return and PLSAX slightly higher at 11.59%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MSXAX having a 15.09% annualized return and PLSAX not far ahead at 15.34%.


MSXAX

1D
0.12%
1M
5.75%
YTD
11.46%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.09%

PLSAX

1D
0.14%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.61%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSXAX vs. PLSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSXAX
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
11.46%17.26%23.98%25.96%-18.52%28.13%17.86%30.69%-4.71%21.07%
PLSAX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
11.59%17.50%26.46%25.70%-18.41%27.93%17.85%30.97%-4.93%21.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MSXAX and PLSAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.99

The correlation between MSXAX and PLSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSXAX vs. PLSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSXAX
MSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PLSAX
PLSAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PLSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSXAX vs. PLSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSXAXPLSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.30

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.18

15.41

-0.23

MSXAX vs. PLSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the PLSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSXAX and PLSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSXAXPLSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.49

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.84

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.88

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.43

+0.13

Drawdowns

MSXAX vs. PLSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSXAX drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, roughly equal to the maximum PLSAX drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSXAX and PLSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSXAXPLSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.48%

-55.67%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-8.94%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-18.78%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-24.69%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-33.79%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-10.15%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.91%

+0.01%

Volatility

MSXAX vs. PLSAX - Volatility Comparison

NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSXAXPLSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.82%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

8.96%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

11.84%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

16.91%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

17.50%

+0.57%

MSXAX vs. PLSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSXAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than PLSAX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSXAX vs. PLSAX - Dividend Comparison

MSXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than PLSAX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSXAX
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
0.95%1.06%5.20%4.04%10.30%4.44%8.78%17.42%14.49%15.18%9.63%5.53%
PLSAX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
2.47%2.75%4.07%3.90%2.70%13.38%7.35%3.57%7.19%6.72%2.93%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MSXAX and PLSAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MSXAX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to PLSAX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSXAX dropped -55.48% vs PLSAX's -55.67%.

PLSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSXAX and PLSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer