PLSAX vs. RPMGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX).
PLSAX is a passively managed fund by Principal Funds that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Feb 2, 2001. RPMGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1992.
Performance
PLSAX vs. RPMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLSAX vs. RPMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLSAX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A | -4.39% | 17.50% | 26.46% | 25.70% | -18.41% | 27.93% | 17.85% | 30.97% | -4.93% | 21.23% |
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -4.07% | 10.55% | 21.08% | 20.27% | -22.51% | 14.94% | 24.16% | 31.53% | -2.12% | 24.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLSAX achieves a -4.39% return, which is significantly lower than RPMGX's -4.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PLSAX has outperformed RPMGX with an annualized return of 13.75%, while RPMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.27% annualized return.
PLSAX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- -4.39%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
RPMGX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLSAX vs. RPMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLSAX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RPMGX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLSAX vs. RPMGX — Risk / Return Rank
PLSAX
RPMGX
PLSAX vs. RPMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLSAX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.72 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.20 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.13 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | 4.47 | +2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLSAX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.72 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.29 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.59 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.67 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLSAX and RPMGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLSAX vs. RPMGX - Dividend Comparison
PLSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than RPMGX's 13.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLSAX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A | 2.88% | 2.75% | 4.07% | 3.90% | 2.70% | 13.38% | 7.35% | 3.57% | 7.19% | 6.72% | 2.93% | 2.36% |
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 13.24% | 12.70% | 20.43% | 6.35% | 2.60% | 10.52% | 4.53% | 5.29% | 12.12% | 8.04% | 3.45% | 9.51% |
Drawdowns
PLSAX vs. RPMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLSAX drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, roughly equal to the maximum RPMGX drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSAX and RPMGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLSAX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -54.66% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -12.47% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.69% | -32.08% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.79% | -35.96% | +2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -7.71% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -6.99% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 3.16% | -0.64% |
Volatility
PLSAX vs. RPMGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A (PLSAX) is 5.33%, while T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that PLSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLSAX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 5.75% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 11.80% | -2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 19.72% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 19.27% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 19.06% | -1.58% |