PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSVVX vs. BIAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSVVX vs. BIAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSVVX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than BIAUX's 16.25% return.


MSVVX

1D
0.74%
1M
4.63%
YTD
7.97%
6M
6.27%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*

BIAUX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.87%
YTD
16.25%
6M
14.16%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSVVX vs. BIAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSVVX
Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund
7.97%8.85%13.89%12.04%-5.18%26.12%7.06%22.95%-2.26%
BIAUX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund
16.25%5.71%11.73%16.16%-8.74%31.11%-5.69%29.85%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MSVVX and BIAUX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018

0.94

The correlation between MSVVX and BIAUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSVVX vs. BIAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSVVX
MSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAUX
BIAUX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BIAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSVVX vs. BIAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSVVXBIAUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

3.95

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

11.55

-6.22

MSVVX vs. BIAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSVVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the BIAUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSVVX and BIAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSVVX vs. BIAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSVVX drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, smaller than the maximum BIAUX drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSVVX and BIAUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSVVXBIAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-45.55%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-8.22%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-25.16%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.20%

-25.16%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-6.17%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

2.81%

+1.29%

Volatility

MSVVX vs. BIAUX - Volatility Comparison

Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) at 4.23%. This indicates that MSVVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSVVXBIAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.23%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

11.34%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.42%

17.03%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

19.77%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.04%

21.57%

+2.47%

MSVVX vs. BIAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSVVX has a 3.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAUX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSVVX vs. BIAUX - Dividend Comparison

MSVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 158.20%, more than BIAUX's 11.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAUX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund
11.60%13.49%16.54%5.94%6.16%0.48%0.47%9.38%14.31%4.11%0.34%2.41%
MSVVX
Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund
158.20%170.80%7.98%4.49%2.89%23.76%0.44%7.93%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSVVX and BIAUX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSVVX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to BIAUX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSVVX dropped -43.18% vs BIAUX's -45.55%.

BIAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSVVX and BIAUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer