PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSVVX vs. HASCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSVVX vs. HASCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSVVX achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly lower than HASCX's 24.07% return.


MSVVX

1D
-0.38%
1M
2.73%
YTD
4.78%
6M
5.98%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*

HASCX

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
24.07%
6M
24.28%
1Y
42.38%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSVVX vs. HASCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSVVX
Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund
4.78%8.85%13.89%12.04%-5.18%26.12%7.06%22.95%-2.26%
HASCX
Harbor Small Cap Value Fund
24.07%3.78%10.93%15.18%-9.59%14.55%13.15%28.97%0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MSVVX and HASCX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2018

0.94

The correlation between MSVVX and HASCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSVVX vs. HASCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSVVX
MSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

HASCX
HASCX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSVVX vs. HASCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSVVXHASCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

2.18

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

3.10

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

4.15

-2.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.66

14.29

-9.64

MSVVX vs. HASCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSVVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the HASCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSVVX and HASCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSVVXHASCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.18

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.40

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.46

+0.02

Drawdowns

MSVVX vs. HASCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSVVX drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, smaller than the maximum HASCX drawdown of -58.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSVVX and HASCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSVVXHASCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-58.90%

+15.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-9.89%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-28.34%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.20%

-28.34%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-3.00%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-8.14%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

2.87%

+1.21%

Volatility

MSVVX vs. HASCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) is 4.29%, while Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that MSVVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HASCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSVVXHASCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

5.92%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

14.47%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

19.35%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

20.73%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.07%

22.90%

+1.17%

MSVVX vs. HASCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSVVX has a 3.06% expense ratio, which is higher than HASCX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSVVX vs. HASCX - Dividend Comparison

MSVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 163.01%, more than HASCX's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HASCX
Harbor Small Cap Value Fund
2.75%3.41%0.62%6.99%7.25%5.64%0.43%1.41%11.18%1.98%0.36%3.98%
MSVVX
Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund
163.01%170.80%7.98%4.49%2.89%23.76%0.44%7.93%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSVVX and HASCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HASCX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to MSVVX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSVVX dropped -43.18% vs HASCX's -58.90%.

HASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSVVX and HASCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer