MSTY vs. ILS
MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTY returned -67.95% vs 7.69% for ILS. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MSTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.
Performance
MSTY vs. ILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTY achieves a -30.54% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 3.63% return.
MSTY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- -19.25%
- YTD
- -30.54%
- 1Y
- -67.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.26%
ILS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 7.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $469.06K | $481.42K | $625.35K | |
| $13.50M | $12.65M | $27.08M |
MSTY vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -30.54% | -40.85% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 3.63% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTY and ILS is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTY vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank
MSTY
ILS
MSTY vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTY | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.73 | -0.94 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 13.95 | -14.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 52.37 | -53.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTY vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTY drawdown since its inception was -77.40%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTY and ILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTY | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.40% | -2.46% | -74.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.91% | -0.55% | -74.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.69% | 0.00% | -72.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.27% | -0.50% | -28.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.33% | 0.15% | +51.18% |
Volatility
MSTY vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.41%. This indicates that MSTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTY | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.14% | 0.41% | +12.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.76% | 1.44% | +50.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.60% | 2.46% | +62.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.75% | 3.63% | +68.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.75% | 3.63% | +68.12% |
MSTY vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTY vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison
MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 241.58%, more than ILS's 8.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.13% | 6.06% | 0.00% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 241.58% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTY and ILS have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to ILS (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTY dropped -77.40% vs ILS's -2.46%.
On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.69% vs -67.95% for MSTY. On fees, MSTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.69% return vs -67.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 241.58%, compared with 8.13% for ILS.
MSTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTY and 1.58% for ILS.
ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTY and ILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer