MSTY vs. ILS
MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTY returned -61.25% vs 7.67% for ILS. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. MSTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.
Performance
MSTY vs. ILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTY achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 1.81% return.
MSTY
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -28.46%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -61.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILS
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -14.73% | -43.86% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 1.81% | 5.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTY and ILS is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTY vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank
MSTY
ILS
MSTY vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTY | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | 2.79 | -3.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | 4.56 | -6.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.62 | -0.81 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 13.93 | -14.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 46.57 | -47.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTY | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 2.79 | -3.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 1.90 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
MSTY vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTY drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTY and ILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTY | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.79% | -1.56% | -70.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.79% | -0.55% | -71.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.48% | 0.00% | -66.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.09% | -0.25% | -25.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.87% | 0.17% | +46.70% |
Volatility
MSTY vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a higher volatility of 17.01% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.88%. This indicates that MSTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTY | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.01% | 0.88% | +16.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.79% | 1.69% | +47.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.44% | 2.77% | +57.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.92% | 3.38% | +68.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.92% | 3.38% | +68.54% |
MSTY vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTY vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison
MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 269.45%, more than ILS's 8.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.09% | 6.06% | 0.00% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 269.45% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTY and ILS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to ILS (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTY dropped -71.79% vs ILS's -1.56%.
On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.67% vs -61.25% for MSTY. On fees, MSTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.67% return vs -61.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 269.45%, compared with 8.09% for ILS.
MSTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTY and 1.58% for ILS.
ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTY and ILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer