PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTY vs. FMED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTY vs. FMED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTY achieves a -12.23% return, which is significantly lower than FMED's -4.75% return.


MSTY

1D
4.50%
1M
-23.91%
YTD
-12.23%
6M
-15.80%
1Y
-60.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMED

1D
0.90%
1M
7.10%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
-6.17%
1Y
8.53%
3Y*
0.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTY vs. FMED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-12.23%-42.71%212.16%
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
-4.75%9.69%-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTY and FMED is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTY vs. FMED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FMED
FMED Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMED Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMED Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTY vs. FMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTYFMEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.09

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

0.47

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

1.03

-2.29

MSTY vs. FMED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the FMED Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTY and FMED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTY vs. FMED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTY drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, which is greater than FMED's maximum drawdown of -21.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTY and FMED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTYFMEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.79%

-21.84%

-49.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.79%

-18.33%

-53.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.49%

-10.64%

-54.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.61%

-7.09%

-19.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.38%

8.27%

+40.11%

Volatility

MSTY vs. FMED - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) at 7.50%. This indicates that MSTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTYFMEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.30%

7.50%

+11.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.85%

15.01%

+34.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.63%

19.37%

+42.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.87%

18.57%

+53.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.87%

18.57%

+53.30%

MSTY vs. FMED - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FMED's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTY vs. FMED - Dividend Comparison

MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 230.78%, while FMED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
0.00%0.00%0.46%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
230.78%294.61%104.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTY and FMED have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to FMED (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTY dropped -71.79% vs FMED's -21.84%.

On 1-year performance, FMED leads with 8.53% vs -60.49% for MSTY. On fees, FMED is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FMED has been the lower-risk option at 7.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMED has performed better with a 8.53% return vs -60.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMED is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 230.78%, compared with 0.00% for FMED.

MSTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FMED is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTY and 0.50% for FMED.

FMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTY and FMED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer