MSTX vs. COTG
MSTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. MSTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
MSTX vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTX achieves a -54.94% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.
MSTX
- 1D
- -14.41%
- 1M
- -56.02%
- YTD
- -54.94%
- 6M
- -72.02%
- 1Y
- -95.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTX vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | -54.94% | -85.05% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTX and COTG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTX vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
MSTX
COTG
MSTX vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | -0.28 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
MSTX vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTX drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTX and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -25.69% | -72.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.61% | -23.48% | -75.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.94% | -8.35% | -61.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.26% | — | — |
Volatility
MSTX vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 112.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.09% | 40.65% | +99.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.46% | 40.65% | +126.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.46% | 40.65% | +126.81% |
MSTX vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTX vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTX nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTX and COTG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.
MSTX and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for MSTX and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for MSTX and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer