MSTW vs. XYLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. MSTW is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, MSTW returned -83.12% vs 18.90% for XYLD. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.

Performance

MSTW vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -49.11% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 8.05% return.

MSTW

• 1D: -5.03%
• 1M: -9.33%
• 6M: -47.69%
• YTD: -49.11%
• 1Y: -83.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -84.93%

XYLD

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: 6.81%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 1Y: 18.90%
• 3Y*: 11.51%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 8.34%
• ALL TIME*: 8.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$1.36M	$1.35M	$3.08M
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	$36.93M	$37.58M	$32.35M

MSTW vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-49.11%	-71.40%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	8.05%	9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTW and XYLD is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

MSTW vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTW

MSTW Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MSTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTW Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MSTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTW Martin Ratio Rank: 1

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 93
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTW vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTW	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	2.53	-3.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.27	3.60	-5.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.56	-0.80
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	3.40	-4.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	17.69	-19.04

MSTW vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTW and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTW vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and XYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTW	XYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.29%	-33.46%	-53.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.75%	-5.29%	-81.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.46%	0.00%	-85.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.78%	-3.68%	-55.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	63.15%	1.02%	+62.13%

Volatility

MSTW vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) has a higher volatility of 21.78% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.92%. This indicates that MSTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTW	XYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.78%	1.92%	+19.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	73.44%	5.97%	+67.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.22%	7.13%	+84.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.37%	11.27%	+79.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.37%	14.15%	+76.22%

MSTW vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTW vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 422.50%, more than XYLD's 10.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	422.50%	106.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.53%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTW and XYLD in my portfolio?

MSTW and XYLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTW or XYLD?

MSTW has higher volatility (21.78%) compared to XYLD (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTW dropped -87.29% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

Which ETF is better, MSTW or XYLD?

On 1-year performance, XYLD leads with 18.90% vs -83.12% for MSTW. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTW or XYLD?

Over the 1-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 18.90% return vs -83.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTW or XYLD?

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTW or XYLD?

MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 422.50%, compared with 10.53% for XYLD.

What is the main difference between MSTW and XYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 0.60% for XYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.