MSTW vs. BTCI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

MSTW vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -40.29% return, which is significantly lower than BTCI's -26.19% return.

MSTW

• 1D: -5.77%
• 1M: -41.43%
• YTD: -40.29%
• 6M: -43.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCI

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: -17.15%
• YTD: -26.19%
• 6M: -26.22%
• 1Y: -35.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTW vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF	-40.29%	-71.40%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-26.19%	-22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTW and BTCI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

MSTW vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTW vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTW	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.86	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.75	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.30	—

Drawdowns

MSTW vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -82.94%, which is greater than BTCI's maximum drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTW	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.94%	-47.16%	-35.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-47.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.94%	-45.42%	-37.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.68%	-16.05%	-39.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSTW	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.38%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.08%	39.73%	+49.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.08%	40.33%	+48.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.08%	40.33%	+48.75%

MSTW vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSTW and BTCI have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

MSTW vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 325.95%, more than BTCI's 48.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	48.44%	36.46%	6.76%
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF	325.95%	106.94%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTW and BTCI in my portfolio?

MSTW and BTCI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSTW or BTCI?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTW or BTCI?

MSTW and BTCI have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTW or BTCI?

MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 325.95%, compared with 48.44% for BTCI.

What is the main difference between MSTW and BTCI?

MSTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Neos.