MSTW vs. BTCI
MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTW vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -16.42% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -20.70% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -10.09%
- 1M
- -27.42%
- YTD
- -16.42%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -5.71%
- 1M
- -12.46%
- YTD
- -20.70%
- 6M
- -22.95%
- 1Y
- -30.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTW vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -16.42% | -71.42% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -20.70% | -22.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and BTCI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
MSTW
BTCI
MSTW vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTW | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.92 | 0.01 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than BTCI's maximum drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.85% | -44.98% | -36.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | -41.37% | -34.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.38% | -15.11% | -39.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.90% | — |
Volatility
MSTW vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.79% | 38.85% | +49.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 40.11% | +48.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 40.11% | +48.68% |
MSTW vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTW and BTCI have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSTW vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.17%, more than BTCI's 42.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 42.05% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 219.17% | 106.94% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTW and BTCI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTW and BTCI have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 219.17%, compared with 42.05% for BTCI.
MSTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Neos.
Find the right allocation for MSTW and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer