MSTVX vs. RMDFX
MSTVX (Morningstar Alternatives Fund) and RMDFX (Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTVX returned 3.68%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for RMDFX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTVX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for RMDFX.
Performance
MSTVX vs. RMDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTVX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than RMDFX's 7.32% return.
MSTVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
RMDFX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.40%
MSTVX vs. RMDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTVX Morningstar Alternatives Fund | 0.75% | 6.42% | 6.37% | 6.86% | -2.69% | 4.20% | 3.81% | 5.82% | -0.05% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 7.32% | 18.85% | 1.45% | 8.01% | -6.84% | 4.20% | 5.10% | 11.50% | -1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTVX and RMDFX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTVX vs. RMDFX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTVX
RMDFX
MSTVX vs. RMDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar Alternatives Fund (MSTVX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTVX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.97 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 4.79 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | 18.77 | -10.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTVX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 4.33 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 0.84 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.84 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
MSTVX vs. RMDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTVX drawdown since its inception was -8.02%, smaller than the maximum RMDFX drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTVX and RMDFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTVX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -15.96% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.84% | -4.19% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | -5.79% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.89% | -14.63% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | 0.00% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -3.33% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 1.07% | -0.36% |
Volatility
MSTVX vs. RMDFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morningstar Alternatives Fund (MSTVX) is 0.54%, while Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that MSTVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTVX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 1.47% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | 3.96% | -2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26% | 4.64% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.15% | 6.34% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 6.23% | -3.09% |
MSTVX vs. RMDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than RMDFX's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTVX vs. RMDFX - Dividend Comparison
MSTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than RMDFX's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTVX Morningstar Alternatives Fund | 3.39% | 3.41% | 3.07% | 3.86% | 3.92% | 4.99% | 2.91% | 1.74% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 4.32% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 0.78% | 5.37% | 2.28% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 2.16% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTVX and RMDFX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMDFX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to MSTVX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTVX dropped -8.02% vs RMDFX's -15.96%.
RMDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTVX and RMDFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer